Posted tagged ‘elder law’

December 8, 2011, Seminar: Planning Your Whole Estate

November 12, 2011

Planning Your Whole Estate—Coordinating Life Insurance, Employee Benefits, and Other Nonprobate Property with the Rest of Your Estate Plan

LocationMatrix Corporate Center, Main Auditorium, First Level, Danbury, Connecticut, 39 Old Ridgebury Road, Danbury, CT

Directions:  Directions to Chipman MazzuccoDon’t rely on your GPS.  Please read and follow these directions.

Date: December 8, 2011
 
Time: 5:15 to 6:45 pm.

Call 203-744-1929 for reservations.  For more contact information, go to the end of this post.

The Last Will and Testament is usually the keystone of an estate plan. It contains the most important instructions for your survivors regarding the use of your assets after your death.

Unfortunately, many people are not aware that a Will usually will not control the disposition of nonprobate assets such as life insurance death benefits, retirement accounts such as 401(k) and IRA plans, annuities, jointly owned property and many other benefits provided under plans offered to employees as part of their employment package.

Unless you properly designate beneficiaries for nonprobate assets and coordinate them with the terms of your Will:

• Your estate plan may be largely ineffective
• Your heirs may pay taxes that could have been avoided
• Family conflict may ensue
• A young beneficiary may receive significant assets too soon 

In addition, unique income tax rules apply to many nonprobate assets. Without proper planning, income tax saving opportunities can be lost and tax traps may ensnare the unwary.

At the seminar, we will be discussing issues related to planning for nonprobate assets and how to coordinate the disposition of such assets with the terms of your Will (or Will substitute such as a revocable living trust).

Go here for a flyer about the seminar: Planning Your Whole Estate—Coordinating Life Insurance, Employee Benefits, and Other Nonprobate Property with the Rest of Your Estate Plan.

SEMINAR LOCATION AND TIME

The seminar will be on December 8, 2011, at the Matrix Corporate Center, Main Auditorium, First Level, 39 Old Ridgebury Road, Danbury, Connecticut from 5:15 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. The doors will open a little before 5:00. Refreshments will be served.

These seminars are always well attended and space is limited. If you wish to attend, or if others you know are interested in attending, to reserve space call us (203-744-1929) or send an e-mail message to me (Richard Land at rsl@danburylaw.com) or Kasey Galner (at ksg@danburylaw.com) or Lynn D’Ostilio (at lsd@danburylaw.com) containing your name, number attending, telephone number and e-mail address.

Posted on 11/12/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

Join Email List

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

Congress Converted Your Federal Estate Tax “Exemption” to an Asset You Can Transfer.

July 12, 2011

As a result of legislation enacted last December, each of us has a federal estate tax “exemption” of $5,000,000. The first reaction of many might be, “So what? I have nothing to tax anyway. This means nothing to me.”

If you are married at the time of your death, however, your $5,000,000 estate tax “exemption” can be transferred to your surviving spouse. As a result, your surviving spouse could have an “exemption” of as much as $10,000,000 (your spouse’s “exemption” plus your “exemption”). Potentially, your “exemption” could save a surviving spouse from $1,500,000 to $2,500,000 in federal estate taxes.

To transfer your “exemption” to your surviving spouse, your Executor must file a federal estate tax return by its due date (nine months after your death unless an extension is requested). If your Executor fails to file the return and make the election, the opportunity to transfer the exemption to your surviving spouse is lost. Problem:  As of July 25, 2011, the IRS has not issued an estate tax return form that includes the election.  Executors of decedents who died early in 2011 should consider filing, before the due date for the return, a request for an extension of time to file the return to preserve the ability to make the election.

Not only will the new portable exemption be a new and useful estate planning tool, the “exemption” probably will be considered when negotiating many prenuptial agreements. It is not a stretch to imagine the lawyer of the wealthy groom-to-be asking his client’s betrothed to make certain her Executor will make the “exemption” election after her death.

It is also not too much of a stretch to think that some wealthy bachelors and bachelorettes may seek out singles with unused “exemptions,” short life expectancies, and no assets, as ideal marriage partners.

Look at it from this slightly different perspective. Imagine that your spouse passes away this year with no assets. You (the surviving spouse) expect to receive a large inheritance in the future when your parents pass away. The inheritance from your parents will push the size of your estate well above $5,000,000 (the size of your exemption).

In such a case, the exemption of your deceased spouse would be very important in shielding your estate (augmented by the inheritance you receive from your parents) from estate taxes at your death; and, as the Executor of your spouse’s estate, you should file a federal estate tax return within nine months after your spouse’s death to claim your spouse’s unused exemption even though your spouse’s estate has no value at all.

The current federal estate tax rules, including the rules relating to the portable exemption, are temporary and are scheduled to expire on January 1, 2013. Estate planners expect Congress to act to prevent expiration of the current rules or to enact different rules. In the meantime, while waiting for Congress to give us a permanent set of rules, it makes sense to take steps to preserve the portable “exemption” for the surviving spouse by filing estate tax returns for the estate of the deceased spouse even when the estate has no value.

Posted on 7/9/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member,  Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

     
  Join Email List  
     

For Email Marketing you can trust.

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

My Spouse Has Passed Away. What Do I Need To Do?

January 28, 2011

When a spouse dies, the survivor will likely feel overwhelmed and may have a difficult time knowing what to do next.   The following is a list of basic steps that the survivor will need to take after the loss of a spouse:

Contact a funeral home immediately and arrange for the burial and memorial services.

Prepare an obituary and consider newspapers for publication.

Notify the employer of the deceased spouse.

Contact previous employers regarding possible pension or other retirement plans and to determine any survivor’s benefits.

Notify the Social Security Administration and any other benefit programs that may be making payments to the deceased spouse or that may be paying a death benefit.

Notify family members, friends and acquaintances.

Contact your financial advisor.

Contact your accountant.

Contact your casualty and liability insurance carrier (homeowner and car).

Obtain access to the deceased spouse’s safety deposit box (if any).

Contact credit card companies.

Consider payment of debts. Debts of the deceased spouse should be paid by the deceased spouse’s estate. A mortgage on a jointly owned home generally should be paid by the joint owner.

Contact your attorney. This does not have to be done immediately after the death but you should speak to an attorney within two months after the date of death to be sure that you take advantage of important post-mortem planning opportunities. It is best not to make any claims for death benefits under a life insurance policy, annuity, IRA, 401(k) or other type of retirement account before reviewing planning options with a knowledgeable attorney.

Gather the following documents:

• The original Will;

• Revocable and Irrevocable Trust Agreements (if applicable);

• Death certificate;

• Marriage certificate;

• Birth certificate;

• Military discharge documents (if applicable);

• Birth certificates of children;

• Deeds for real property;

• Statements relating to bank and investment accounts;

• Life insurance policies

• Title to any vehicles; and

• Any other information regarding assets owned by your spouse.

Your attorney will be able to guide you through the necessary steps to settle your spouse’s estate.

Posted on 1/28/2011 by Kasey S. Galner, Associate, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 


For Email Marketing you can trust

Special Needs Trusts

August 6, 2010

Trust management for the inheritance of a disabled beneficiary can be very important. In addition to providing benefits and management for the disabled beneficiary’s inheritance, the goals of such a trust usually include protection of the trust assets from the beneficiary’s creditors and exclusion of the trust assets from consideration if the beneficiary needs to apply for government aid (for example, Medicaid to pay the costs of long term care). When we refer to a Special Needs Trust, we are referring to a trust established to accomplish such goals.

As discussed here, in order for a disabled person to become eligible, and remain eligible, for government benefits like Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), the person must meet strict income and asset criteria. The Connecticut Department of Social Services (“DSS”) takes into account all “countable assets” when determining eligibility for benefits. Even after approval for these benefits, any changes in assets or income, even from an inheritance, can disqualify the person from the assistance he or she needs.

DSS considers a trust created for general maintenance and support as a countable asset for Medicaid purposes. On the other hand, a trust created strictly for supplemental needs, if drafted properly, will not be counted and can be a way to provide additional support to family members who rely on government benefits. The main question is whether a trust is a general support trust (counted as an asset) or a supplemental needs trust (not counted).

The answer depends upon what the person who created the trust intended to create. This may sound simple enough, but even if a Will says, “This trust is intended to be a supplemental needs trust,” the court may still find that it is, in fact, a general support trust. The courts look at the language of the trust instrument in its totality to determine the testator’s intent.

The courts weigh most heavily the amount of discretion the Trustee has over trust distributions. In order for a trust to qualify as a supplemental needs trust, the Trustee must have complete discretion over the trust payments including the discretion not to make distributions to the beneficiary. Seemingly harmless attempts to include standards for the exercise of discretion can result in the creation of a general support trust instead of a supplemental needs trust. If a trust includes guidelines regarding the Trustee’s exercise of discretion, the guidelines should be merely precatory—in the nature of expressing a mere “fond hope,” “wish” or “desire.” Any guideline or instruction that is more definite may limit Trustee discretion with the result of jeopardizing the goals mentioned above.

In the case of Zeoli v. Commissioner of Social Services, the Court held that the Trustee had “absolute and uncontrolled discretion,” over any and all distributions. As a result, the trust assets were not countable in determining eligibility for aid. In more recent decisions, like the decision in Rome v. Wilson-Coker, the Court seemed to suggest that “unfettered” should be added to the “absolute and uncontrolled” standard the Zeoli court used.

For instance, whenever a trust has only one beneficiary and the instructions provide that distributions are to be made for the beneficiary’s “best interest and general welfare” or that the trust assets may be used to support the beneficiary in “reasonable comfort,” the Court may hold that the Trustee’s discretion is not unlimited and that it would be an abuse of discretion for the Trustee to withhold payments when needed for general support. In that case, the trust would fail to achieve the intended goals. This was the approach taken by the Rome Court.

Unlike the Rome case, the Zeoli case involved a trust with more than one beneficiary. Its holding suggests that a Special Needs Trust should include multiple trust beneficiaries while giving the Trustee the ability to benefit one beneficiary and exclude others. The beneficiary’s case is even stronger if the terms of the trust provide that the trust is intended to be a supplement to, rather than a substitute for, other resources.

A Special Needs Trust for a surviving spouse must be established under the terms of a Will (not a revocable trust). Even if the trust for the surviving spouse satisfies all the requirements suggested by the Zeoli and Rome cases, if the trust is established under the terms of the revocable trust agreement of the deceased spouse (instead of under the terms of the Will of the deceased spouse), the trust will be considered a countable asset and disqualify the surviving spouse for Medicaid benefits to pay the costs of long term care. Accordingly, if the goals of a Special Needs Trust for the benefit of a surviving spouse are to be achieved, the trust must be established under the terms of a Will; the Probate Court and the probate process must become involved.

Unfortunately, many people have been frightened into believing that the probate process is something that must be avoided at all costs. As a result, they have used revocable lifetime trusts as the primary vehicle for disposing of their assets at death. If the intention of the revocable trust is to create a Special Needs Trust for the benefit of a surviving spouse, however, it will fail to accomplish the intended goals.

A Special Needs Trust can be an essential tool to enhance the life of its disabled beneficiary who is relying on government assistance programs.  If drafted improperly, trust assets may be depleted rapidly leaving the beneficiary completely dependent upon an impersonal welfare system which is vulnerable to change at any time.

Posted on 8/6/2010 by Kasey S. Galner, Associate, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

Elder Law—Basics of Planning for Incapacity

January 5, 2010

Caution: The following applies to residents of Connecticut and reflects the law as it exists on January 1, 2010. The law relating to long term care frequently changes. Before any planning decisions are made and implemented, it is important to consult with a professional who keeps current on changes in the law and policies of the agencies that administer long term care programs.

Delegating Authority to Caregivers

If you become incapable without the necessary documents in place, the court will have to become involved and appoint someone to act on your behalf. Three documents can minimize the need for court involvement when you are no longer able to make decisions for yourself.

1. Durable Power of Attorney

The durable power of attorney is a document in which you designate one or more people to act as your agent (to pay your bills, manage your finances, etc.) if you become incapacitated. It is important to note that even if you already have a durable power of attorney in place, banks and financial institutions may be hesitant to accept old documents. Therefore, you should re-execute your power of attorney every couple of years to ensure it will be effective when you need it.

2. Health Care Instructions (“Living Will”)

Your Health Care Instructions (frequently called an Advance Directive or “Living Will”) is a document in which you designate someone to make health care decisions on your behalf if you become incapacitated. It can include instructions about life support, end of life decisions, and organ donation.

3. Designation of Conservator

If, for any reason, the previous two documents are deemed invalid, the court will look at your Designation of Conservator to see whom you have chosen to be the agent of your property and your person when you are incapacitated.

Planning for Long Term Care Costs

Most U.S. residents will need home care or nursing home care (or both) during the course of life. Many people, however, are unaware of the actual cost of long term care services. For instance, the average monthly cost for nursing home care today is $9,959 ($119,508 annually). The actual costs of more desirable nursing homes will be quite a bit more. Without proper planning, you may find yourself in a difficult situation when you or your spouse need long term care.

1. Medicare (Not a Solution)

A common misconception is that Medicare will cover the cost of long term care. While Medicare will cover some nursing home care (up to 100 days only) and home care for acute needs, it will not cover you indefinitely. After 100 days in a nursing home or after your acute needs are met through home care, you will have to find another way to pay for your long term care needs.

2. Medicaid (Provider When Assets Exhausted)

Another common misconception is that when you need long term care you can qualify for Medicaid (sometimes referred to as Title XIX) relatively easily. However, it is not easy to become eligible for Medicaid. The Department of Social Services (“DSS”) has strict asset and income guidelines that an applicant must meet before qualifying for benefits.

For example, a single individual applying for Medicaid home care benefits can have a maximum of $1,600 in assets (DSS excludes certain assets such as the value of the home) and a monthly income of $2,022 and still be eligible. If both spouses are applying for Medicaid home care benefits, they can each keep $1,600 in assets ($3,200 total plus the home) and a combined monthly income of $4,044. If the actual income exceeds the income limits, trust arrangements can be made to assure eligibility while protecting the interests of the state.

If an unmarried individual needs long term care in a facility, the monthly income maximum drops to $69 (with certain exceptions). For married couples, if only one spouse is applying for benefits, the other spouse (the “community spouse”) may be able to keep additional assets of up to $109,560 plus the home and a monthly income of at least $1,821.25 and as much as $2,739 (adjustments may be obtained through the Fair Hearing process).  If the actual income exceeds the income limits, excess income will be applied to the cost of nursing home care.

DSS not only looks at your assets as of the date of your application, but it also looks at any transfers you have made for less than fair market value within the last five years. This includes transfers to a trust (with some exceptions), the purchase of certain annuities, and gifts to your children. Any such transfer will result in a period of disqualification (a “penalty”) from Medicaid eligibility, based on the value of the property you transferred. The penalty period does not begin to run until you have met the asset and income requirements, at which time you will be required to cover the cost of care until the penalty period ends.

Anyone who may need Medicaid to cover long term care services within the next five years should be aware of these transfer rules before making any gifts. Certain transfers, if well-planned, can be made without causing a penalty.

Keep in mind, if you or your spouse may need Medicaid to cover your long term care needs you should re-examine your Wills and any beneficiary designations you may have on life insurance policies or other accounts. Once you have qualified for Medicaid, any assets you receive (through inheritance or otherwise) could disqualify you.

3. Long Term Care Insurance

Many people think that long term care insurance is unnecessary or not worth the expense. However, long term care insurance, while not suitable for everyone, can be extremely beneficial. People with middle-incomes, who might otherwise spend down their assets to apply for Medicaid, may find long term care insurance is a worthwhile alternative.

Connecticut has created the Connecticut Partnership for Long Term Care whereby private insurance companies sell state-approved insurance policies that cover long term care costs (both home care and nursing home care). A key feature of this program is the built-in Medicaid asset protection that applies if you ever need state assistance. The Medicaid asset protection allows you to qualify for Medicaid benefits without meeting the usual asset limitations (stated above). DSS allows you to keep one extra dollar of assets for every dollar that your policy has paid for your long term care. This can protect a large portion of your assets that you would have otherwise spent down to become eligible.

Posted on 1/4/2010 by Kasey S. Galner, Associate, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

Chipman Mazzucco Land & Pennarola’s Estate Planning and Elder Law Blog

December 31, 2009

We recently told our clients that we expected Congress to take action before the end of 2009 to prevent repeal of the U.S. estate tax in 2010. We were wrong. Congress failed to take action.  As a result, estate planning is more difficult than ever.

For the first time since 1915, until Congress acts to re-impose an estate tax, there will be no estate tax on estates of those who die in 2010.

You might expect that the absence of the U.S. estate tax would make life simpler. Look a little under the surface, however, and you begin to understand that absence of the U.S. estate tax leaves behind certain provisions relating to capital gain taxes which will adversely affect everyone who has assets (and I literally mean everyone) while the estate tax, before repeal, adversely affected only a very small group.

The planning for long term care is also constantly changing in an environment where deficits resulting from a weak economy, bank and auto company bailouts, overseas commitments and entitlement programs create pressures to cut programs for those who have the least political muscle.

The planning environment is rapidly changing.  This blog is to help you keep track of the changes that affect you.

As the estate planning scene develops, stay tuned here for summaries of law changes, notices of seminars we will be offering to our clients and their advisors and other new content regarding estate planning and elder law issues.

Our next seminar (entitled “Is it time to review your estate plan?”) is scheduled for January 28, 2010, at the Ethan Allen Inn, Danbury, Connecticut, from 7:00 to 9:00 PM.  Space is limited.  If you wish to attend, contact me at rsl@danburylaw.com or Lynn D’Ostilio at lsd@danburylaw.com to make reservations.

Posted on 12/30/2009 by Richard S. Land, Member, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.