Archive for the ‘Estate Tax and Estate Planning Developments’ category

Seminar Podcast/Slide Presentation (December 8, 2011)

December 26, 2011

Background

On December 8 we made an estate planning presentation to clients,  friends of the firm, and our new neighbors at the Matrix Corporate Center.  The title:  Planning Your Whole Estate (Coordinating Life Insurance, Employee Benefits and Other Nonprobate Property with the Rest of Your Estate Plan).

A question and answer period followed.  One of the more challenging questions, relating to the ability to roll over  lump sum distributions from retirement plans, inspired a post that you can find here:  Lump Sum Rollover of Retirement Account Not as Simple as Expected.

Although a podcast/slide show is not quite as effective (you miss out on the questions and answers) or fun (you miss out on the food, refreshments and good-natured conversation) as the actual in-person presentation, we thought those who could not attend might appreciate the podcast/slide show as presented below in eight parts. 

The Podcast/Slide Presentation

We hope you find the presentation helpful.

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 1 (your will; probate property vs. nonprobate property)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 2 (common estate planning mistakes; life insurance beneficiary designations; trusts; guardianships; “in trust for accounts”, retirement accounts; joint property; protection from long term care costs; simple wills)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 3  (jointly owned property; “in trust for” accounts; life insurance beneficiary and ownership)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 4 (taxation of life insurance; retirement plan accounts; special tax problems relating to individual retirement accounts and other similar accounts)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 5 (continuation of special tax problems relating to individual retirement accounts and other similar accounts)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 6 (continuation of special tax problems relating to individual retirement accounts and other similar accounts; trusts as beneficiary of IRA; beneficiary designation forms)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 7 (revocable living trusts; reasons to consider: asset management during disability and probate avoidance)

Planning Your Whole Estate Part 8 (continuation of issues relating to revocable living trusts including bogus reasons for revocable living trusts)

We hope you will join us at our next seminar.  If you would like to attend, join our email list by clicking on the button below.

Posted on 12/26/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

     
  Join Email List  
     

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

December 8, 2011, Seminar: Planning Your Whole Estate

November 12, 2011

Planning Your Whole Estate—Coordinating Life Insurance, Employee Benefits, and Other Nonprobate Property with the Rest of Your Estate Plan

LocationMatrix Corporate Center, Main Auditorium, First Level, Danbury, Connecticut, 39 Old Ridgebury Road, Danbury, CT

Directions:  Directions to Chipman MazzuccoDon’t rely on your GPS.  Please read and follow these directions.

Date: December 8, 2011
 
Time: 5:15 to 6:45 pm.

Call 203-744-1929 for reservations.  For more contact information, go to the end of this post.

The Last Will and Testament is usually the keystone of an estate plan. It contains the most important instructions for your survivors regarding the use of your assets after your death.

Unfortunately, many people are not aware that a Will usually will not control the disposition of nonprobate assets such as life insurance death benefits, retirement accounts such as 401(k) and IRA plans, annuities, jointly owned property and many other benefits provided under plans offered to employees as part of their employment package.

Unless you properly designate beneficiaries for nonprobate assets and coordinate them with the terms of your Will:

• Your estate plan may be largely ineffective
• Your heirs may pay taxes that could have been avoided
• Family conflict may ensue
• A young beneficiary may receive significant assets too soon 

In addition, unique income tax rules apply to many nonprobate assets. Without proper planning, income tax saving opportunities can be lost and tax traps may ensnare the unwary.

At the seminar, we will be discussing issues related to planning for nonprobate assets and how to coordinate the disposition of such assets with the terms of your Will (or Will substitute such as a revocable living trust).

Go here for a flyer about the seminar: Planning Your Whole Estate—Coordinating Life Insurance, Employee Benefits, and Other Nonprobate Property with the Rest of Your Estate Plan.

SEMINAR LOCATION AND TIME

The seminar will be on December 8, 2011, at the Matrix Corporate Center, Main Auditorium, First Level, 39 Old Ridgebury Road, Danbury, Connecticut from 5:15 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. The doors will open a little before 5:00. Refreshments will be served.

These seminars are always well attended and space is limited. If you wish to attend, or if others you know are interested in attending, to reserve space call us (203-744-1929) or send an e-mail message to me (Richard Land at rsl@danburylaw.com) or Kasey Galner (at ksg@danburylaw.com) or Lynn D’Ostilio (at lsd@danburylaw.com) containing your name, number attending, telephone number and e-mail address.

Posted on 11/12/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

Join Email List

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

“I Don’t Need a Will”—Common Misconceptions Regarding the Necessity of Wills in Connecticut

November 5, 2011

1. “My spouse and I don’t need Wills because, if one of us dies, the surviving spouse will inherit everything automatically.”

While this may be true for property that is held jointly with rights of survivorship or property that passes by beneficiary designation (a/k/a non-probate property), this is not always the case for property that is held in the deceased spouse’s sole name (a/k/a probate property). 

If you are married and your spouse dies without a Will, you may not receive all of your spouse’s property.  In fact, your IN-LAWS could receive a portion of your spouse’s probate property (which is not what many people would intend).  For example, the following table illustrates what happens if your spouse dies without a Will in Connecticut, with probate property worth $1,000,000, based on the following circumstances:

 

You Receive

 

Children Receive

Spouse’s Parent’s Receive

If you and your spouse have no children

 

$1,000,000

 

n/a

 

n/a

If you and your spouse have children

 

$550,000

 

 

$450,000

 

n/a

If you and your spouse have children and one or more of the children are your spouse’s from a prior marriage

 

 

 

$500,000

 

 

 

$500,000

 

 

 

n/a

If you and your spouse have no children and your spouse has surviving parents

 

 

$775,000

 

 

n/a

 

 

$225,000

Based on the table above, consider the following scenarios:

a. Your spouse dies and you have a two-year-old child.  Your two-year-old child will receive an inheritance of $450,000 and you will receive $550,000.

b.  Same example as above except the two-year-old child is your spouse’s child from a prior marriage.  The child will receive even more, $500,000, and you will receive $500,000.

c.  You and your spouse have no children, but one or both of your spouse’s parents survive your spouse.  No matter how you feel about your in-laws, they will receive $225,000 (a quarter of your spouse’s probate property).

In addition, if you and your spouse do not have Wills, you could lose out on some significant tax planning and asset protection planning opportunities.  For a detailed discussion about tax planning and asset protection planning see our previous articles (Special Needs Trusts, Making Use of Estate Tax Marital Deductions and Estate Tax Exemptions in 2010–To Be Updated).

2. “I don’t need a Will because I am not married and I have no children so everything will pass to my siblings, right?”

If you are single and you die without a Will in Connecticut with probate property worth $1,000,000, the following table illustrates how such property would be distributed based on the following circumstances:

 

Children Receive

Parents Receive

Siblings Receive

Nieces & Nephews Receive

Next of Kin Receives

If you have children $1,000,000        
If you have no children and one or more parents survive you n/a $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0
If you have no children, no surviving parent, but surviving siblings n/a n/a $1,000,000 $0 $0
Same as above, except no surviving siblings but surviving nieces/nephews n/a n/a n/a $1,000,000 $0
No children, parents, siblings, nieces or nephews n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,000,000

As illustrated above, if you do not have children and die without a Will in Connecticut, your parents will receive your property, if your parents survive you.  For some people, leaving property to their parents is not a problem.  However, consider the following scenarios:

a.  Your parents are in a nursing home and rely on government benefits to cover the cost of their nursing home care.  Any inheritance that they receive from you will cause them to lose their government benefits.  They will have to spend the inheritance on their nursing home care and, if any assets are left when they pass away, the state may be entitled to the remainder.

b.  Your parents have large estates and they may have an estate tax problem when they die.  Any inheritance they receive from you could push their estates over the applicable estate tax exemption and could result in a potentially large estate tax when they die.

c.  Your parents are doing fine but your brother is struggling to make ends meet with three kids to support.  Without a Will, your brother will not receive any inheritance from you if your parents are still living.

If the last row of the table above applies to you and you die without a Will, your next of kin will inherit your property.  This could mean that distant cousins you have never heard of will share equally with cousins you have known all your life.  In addition, your Administrator will have the responsibility of locating your heirs and proving to the Probate Court that no other heirs exist.  Proving a negative can be a costly and time consuming endeavor.  Some Probate Courts will require your Administrator to hire an heir search firm (and pay the costs of such firm out of your estate).

3.  “I don’t need a Will because I don’t have any assets, so why waste the time and money?”

Appointing a Guardian

If you have minor children, the most important reason to have a Will, regardless of your net worth, is to name a Guardian who will take care of your children when you and the other biological parent have passed away.  If you do not have a Will that appoints a Guardian, the Court will appoint someone for you.  Most people do not want to leave this kind of decision up to the Court’s discretion.

Appointing an Executor

If you have no Will, the Probate Court will have to appoint an Administrator to settle your estate.  The Court will typically look for a family member to be the Administrator.  However, you will have no control over who that family member will be.  Your estranged untrustworthy cousin may be the only family member who lives nearby.   

Instead of letting the Court choose who has control over your assets when you pass away, you can name an Executor (and back-up Executors) in your Will.  Besides being able to control who will control your assets when you die, naming an Executor makes the estate settlement process quicker, easier, and less costly.

Posted on 11/5/2011 by Kasey S. Galner, Associate, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 

 

For Email Marketing you can trust

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

What a Trustee’s Account Looks Like

October 12, 2011

We recently posted an article on standards of conduct that apply to Trustees here: Avoiding the Trustee’s Worst Nightmare.

We also posted a related article on trust administration here: Dreams Come True (Fiduciary Accounting Made Easy?).

Those posts mentioned the Trustee’s duty to account. You can find a sample of a Trustee’s account here: Sample Trustee’s Account.

If you have any questions about fiduciary accounting, give us a call or email us at the email addresses shown below and we will be pleased to help.

Posted on 10/12/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member,  Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

If you would like to receive notices of future postings and seminar announcements, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

     
  Join Email List  
     

For Email Marketing you can trust.

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

Avoiding the Trustee’s Worst Nightmare

September 4, 2011

The Trustee’s worst nightmare is to be cross-examined by a blood thirsty litigator whose sole goal is to make the Trustee look as bad as possible. The Trustee thwarts the litigator’s attacks by paying close attention to the standards of fiduciary conduct that govern the Trustee’s activities and by creating an organized and detailed record of the Trustee’s deliberations and transactions.

The purpose of this post is to describe the steps the new Trustee should take to get started on the “right foot.” It is based on a publication by LawFirst Publishing entitled “The Trustee’s Guide” and is meant only to provide general guidance. Management of your trusts must take the specific terms of the trusts into account as well as the general principles described in this post.

For previous posts regarding trusts, go here: The Benefits of Trusts and Special Needs Trusts.

A. Background

A settlor (creator of a trust) may form a trust through a will or through a trust instrument. Either way, a trust is a legal device that allows a Trustee, the legal owner of the trust property, to manage the property for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries, the equitable owners of the trust property. The Trustee owes several duties to all the beneficiaries of the trust. Frequently, the beneficiaries of the income are different from the beneficiaries of the principal. This has important ramifications for accounting and investment purposes.

B. Trustee Duties

The Trustee has the duties summarized below:

1. Duty of Loyalty

Except for reasonable compensation for serving as Trustee, a Trustee may not receive a personal benefit from a transaction or decision. The Trustee administers the trust solely in the interest of the beneficiaries. A Trustee may not engage in self-dealing without court approval.

2. Duty to Deal Impartially with Beneficiaries

The Trustee has a duty to treat all beneficiaries impartially except when the terms of the trust provide otherwise. Accordingly, the Trustee should be even-handed in the Trustee’s dealings with all the beneficiaries.

3. Duty to Take Possession and Control of Trust Property

If trust property is in the possession and control of a third party, the Trustee has a duty to take necessary steps to take possession and control.

4. Duty to Keep Trust Property Separated

The Trustee has a duty to keep trust property separate from other property. The Trustee is prohibited from commingling trust property with the Trustee’s own property.

5. Duty to Preserve the Trust Property

The Trustee has a duty to protect the trust property from loss or damage. This will take different forms with different assets: insurance coverage for real and tangible property; safe deposit boxes and custodian arrangements for securities; and climate control for paintings, etc. The Trustee should not engage in speculative investing.

6. Duty to Make Trust Property Productive

The Trustee has a duty to convert unproductive property to productive property unless the terms of the document provide otherwise.

7. Duty to Pay Income to the Income Beneficiary

Unless the terms of the trust provide otherwise (and they frequently do), the Trustee has a duty to distribute income to the trust beneficiaries in reasonable intervals during the term of the trust.

8. Duty to Keep and Render Accounts

The Trustee has a duty to keep clear and accurate accounts showing in detail the nature and value of all the trust property and how the property has been administered.  Go here for a sample of a Trustee’s account:  Sample Trustee’s Account.

9. Duty to Furnish Information

The Trustee has a duty to satisfy a beneficiary’s reasonable requests for information. See Section F.2. below.

10. Duty to Exercise Reasonable Care and Skill

The Trustee has a duty to exercise the same skill and care that someone with ordinary prudence would exercise with respect to his or her own property. In addition, pursuant to Connecticut law, when investing and managing trust property, the Trustee has a duty to do so in accordance with the “prudent investor standard” as defined in the Connecticut Uniform Prudent Investor Act starting at Section 45a-451 of the Connecticut General Statutes (copy attached). Pursuant to New York law, when investing and managing trust property, the Trustee has a duty to do so in accordance with the “prudent investor standard” as defined in Section 11-2.3 of New York’s Estates, Powers and Trust Law (copy attached).

11. Duty Not to Delegate

The Trustee is personally responsible for exercising his or her judgment as Trustee. The Trustee cannot avoid responsibility by delegating such responsibility. With respect to investment management, however, the Trustee who lacks the skill and experience to manage investments is well-advised to retain competent investment professionals.

12. Duty to Enforce Claims

The Trustee has a duty to use reasonable efforts to enforce the trust’s claims.

13. Duty to Defend Actions

The Trustee has a duty to take reasonable steps to defend the trust property against the claims and actions of others.

C. Initial Set Up of Trust

1. Accept or Decline Appointment

Until you accept your appointment as Trustee, you are under no obligation to administer the trust. You may indicate acceptance in writing or by performing acts as Trustee. To decline appointment, you should complete a simple written statement that notifies the court or appropriate person of your intentions. The remainder of this post presumes that you already have accepted or plan to accept your appointment.

2. Gather Documents

To properly administer the trust, you will need to assemble the following documents shortly after accepting your appointment:

i. The trust instrument, which may take the form of an original of the trust agreement, a certified copy of the will, or a certified copy of a court decree establishing the trust.

ii. The following, if provided under a document other than the trust instrument:

a. An original of your written appointment as trustee.

b. An original of the agreement (if any) concerning your compensation as Trustee.

iii. Contact information for each beneficiary, including full names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and home and business addresses, telephone numbers, and fax numbers.

iv. Deeds to real property transferred to the trust.

v. If the trust was created by a will:

a. A certified copy of settlor’s death certificate.

b. A copy of the estate’s federal estate tax return, if any.

c. A copy of the Connecticut estate tax return.

d. A copy of the executor’s final accounting if the trust is established pursuant to a Will.

vi. If you are replacing a prior trustee:

a. An original of the resignation or the removal of prior trustee.

b. A copy of prior trustee’s accounting.

Original documents, and other important documents, should be kept in a lockable fireproof file cabinet or safe. If you keep records on your personal computer, be sure to back up frequently. Many of the documents listed above, including the trust instrument, deeds, tax returns, and contracts with agents should be retained permanently. Insurance policies should be held for at least three years after their expiration date, while approved accountings should be retained until the trust terminates and the final distributions have been made to the beneficiaries and approved either by the interested parties or by the Court having jurisdiction.

3. Apply for a Federal Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) for the Trust

Use IRS Form SS-4, Application for Taxpayer Identification Number. If you are the Trustee of a trust created by a will, you still must apply for a TIN even though the estate already has its own TIN.

4. Notify the IRS of Your Position as Trustee

Use IRS Form 56, Notice Concerning Fiduciary Relationship. This form notifies the IRS that you are the Trustee and should be receiving communications relating to the trust. At your discretion, you may also file Form 56 with your first federal tax return for the trust. If you are replacing a prior Trustee, it is essential to file Form 56 in a timely manner so that the IRS can direct communications about any prior delinquencies to you. You should file Form 56 again at the end of your term as Trustee to inform the IRS that the trust relationship has ended.

5. Obtain a Bond if Required

A bond protects the trust in the event that you are unable to make good any losses from your negligence, breach of fiduciary duty or criminal acts. Connecticut and New York laws require Trustees of trusts created by a will to obtain a bond, unless the Will waives this requirement.

The bond will not protect the Trustee against personal loss from a breach (negligent or otherwise) of one of the Trustee’s many duties. Individual Trustees will find it difficult to insure against such loss through a fiduciary liability policy because insurers consider non-professional Trustees to be a high risk.

You can decrease your personal exposure by delegating duties to attorneys, investment managers, tax consultants, and others who qualify for professional liability coverage.

6. Create an Investment Policy Statement

An investment policy statement is a written policy that governs the investment process. While not required, we recommend creating one because it can help you explain to beneficiaries or a court that you constructed and followed a suitable investment program.

Although your investment policy statement must conform to the terms of the trust, you have great flexibility in crafting it. At a minimum, it should cover:

i. Goals and objectives.

ii. Time frames.

iii. Acceptable levels of risk.

iv. Liquidity and income needs of beneficiaries.

v. Types of investments.

vi. Asset allocation strategy.

vii. Selection and monitoring of financial advisors.

viii. Procedures for amendment and review of your investment policy.

7. Meet with the Beneficiaries

As soon as is practicable, you should meet with the beneficiaries. A typical meeting should include a discussion of:

i. The terms of the trust, including any restrictions on investment.

ii. The duties of a Trustee.

iii. Fees and other expenses of the trust.

iv. Tax consequences for the trust and the beneficiaries.

v. Beneficiaries’ preferences for communication.

Additionally, there are a few simple things which you may wish to do to make the meeting run smoothly and to avoid misunderstandings. Consider providing each beneficiary with an agenda, an accordion-type folder containing pre-labeled folders for correspondence, statements, copies of documents, and tax information to ensure that they have easy access to all documentation, and a summary of the meeting in a follow-up letter.

D. Managing Trust Income and Principal

Assuming a the trust is either a Connecticut or New York trust, unless the terms of the trust provide otherwise, all Trustees must adhere to the applicable Prudent Investor Act (see the Connecticut Uniform Prudent Investor Act and the New York Prudent Investor Act). Under such acts, Trustees owe the beneficiaries several duties, including the duty to review the trust assets shortly after receiving them to ensure that they comply with the terms of the applicable Act, to invest the trust assets as a prudent investor would, to diversify investments, to act impartially towards beneficiaries, to consider only the interests of the beneficiaries when investing, and to incur only reasonable investment costs. It sets forth specific factors that Trustees must consider when managing trust assets. Actual return on investments is irrelevant; you are only liable to the beneficiaries for failure to follow the standards of conduct set forth in the Act. An Investment Policy Statement, described above, will aid greatly in compliance with the Act.

Trustees also must adhere to the applicable Principal and Income Act. This Act determines which disbursements the Trustee shall make from income and which from principal.

New York’s Act and Connecticut’s Act are quite different in some important respects. For example, in Connecticut, one-half of the Trustee’s compensation and all of the administrative expenses must be paid from income, while estate taxes and payments on the principal of a trust debt must be paid from principal. In New York, one-third of the regular fees of persons providing investment advisory or custodial services and all of the ordinary expenses relating to administration, management or preservation of trust property must be paid from income, while estate taxes and payments on the principal of a trust debt must be paid from principal. Each of the Connecticut Act and the New York Act has several exceptions and different rules for different types of assets, so it is best for you to obtain proper guidance specific to your situation.

E. Distributions

Distributions take the form of required and discretionary distributions. Required distributions are relatively easy to manage: the trust instrument will specify regularly scheduled distributions or distributions after the happening of an event (such as a beneficiary attaining a certain age). Your power to make discretionary distributions is spelled out in the trust instrument. Whether you are responding to a request from a beneficiary or initiating the distribution on your own, you should document the purpose of the distribution, the source of income, and the possible adverse effects on other beneficiaries.

F. Filing Requirements

1. To the Probate Court

a. Inventory

In Connecticut, if the trust is established pursuant to a decedent’s Will, you will need to file an inventory with the Probate Court having jurisdiction over the settlement of the decedent’s estate. An inventory of trust assets includes a description of the trust property, the date received, its adjusted cost basis, and its market value on the date it legally became trust property. You may wish to list assets by category, such as cash, fixed income, common stock, and real estate.

b. Accounting

In Connecticut, if you are the Trustee of a trust created by a Will, you must file an accounting with the Probate Court every three years (unless the will excuses these filings). For other trusts, except for the final accounting, you need only file an accounting with the Probate Court when a beneficiary requests one. In Connecticut, all Trustees of trusts established pursuant to a decedent’s Will must file a final accounting with the Probate Court when the trust terminates. An accounting provides all interested parties with complete transaction information regarding the contents of the trust, including all receipts and disbursements.  For a sample of a Trustee’s account, go here:  Sample Trustee’s Account.

2. To the Beneficiaries

You have a duty as Trustee to provide a beneficiary with information the beneficiary reasonably requests about the nature and value of the trust property and information needed to enforce the beneficiary’s rights under the terms of the trust. The Trustee is required to satisfy only those requests that are reasonable based on the circumstances.

The terms of the trust frequently include instructions to the Trustee regarding periodic reporting to the beneficiaries of the trust. The Trustee has a duty to follow such instructions.

3. Tax Returns and Taxes

a. On Behalf of the Trust

Trust income is subject to taxation. The Trustee is responsible for filing federal and State income tax returns on a calendar year basis. The Trustee is also responsible for making estimated tax payments.

Keep in mind that the maximum tax bracket for trusts (35%) applies when a trust’s taxable income exceeds a mere $11,200. When computing the taxable income of a trust, the trust is entitled to deductions related to income distributions from the trust. A beneficiary who receives income distributions from a trust is required to report such income on the beneficiary’s income tax return. The Trustee is required to provide this information to the beneficiary and the tax authorities as part of the income tax returns which the Trustee must file.

Tax laws are complex and change frequently. A Trustee who lacks skill and experience in fiduciary income tax matters should retain the services of a tax professional.

b. On Your Own Behalf as Trustee

For tax purposes, a Trustee is a self-employed individual. Therefore, you will have to file Schedule C, Profit or Loss from a Business, with your federal income tax return Form 1040. If you already file Schedule C for a different business, you will need to file a separate Schedule C for your activities as Trustee.

Trustee fees are earned income and as such, they may change your tax bracket or affect your eligibility for Social Security benefits. If your net profit on Schedule C exceeds $400, you will have to file Schedule SE, Self Employment Tax. If you show a net loss on Schedule C, you may be able to offset other income on Form 1040. Again, we recommend that you consult with a tax advisor regarding these issues.

Posted on 9/4/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member,  Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

     
  Join Email List  
     

For Email Marketing you can trust.

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

Congress Converted Your Federal Estate Tax “Exemption” to an Asset You Can Transfer.

July 12, 2011

As a result of legislation enacted last December, each of us has a federal estate tax “exemption” of $5,000,000. The first reaction of many might be, “So what? I have nothing to tax anyway. This means nothing to me.”

If you are married at the time of your death, however, your $5,000,000 estate tax “exemption” can be transferred to your surviving spouse. As a result, your surviving spouse could have an “exemption” of as much as $10,000,000 (your spouse’s “exemption” plus your “exemption”). Potentially, your “exemption” could save a surviving spouse from $1,500,000 to $2,500,000 in federal estate taxes.

To transfer your “exemption” to your surviving spouse, your Executor must file a federal estate tax return by its due date (nine months after your death unless an extension is requested). If your Executor fails to file the return and make the election, the opportunity to transfer the exemption to your surviving spouse is lost. Problem:  As of July 25, 2011, the IRS has not issued an estate tax return form that includes the election.  Executors of decedents who died early in 2011 should consider filing, before the due date for the return, a request for an extension of time to file the return to preserve the ability to make the election.

Not only will the new portable exemption be a new and useful estate planning tool, the “exemption” probably will be considered when negotiating many prenuptial agreements. It is not a stretch to imagine the lawyer of the wealthy groom-to-be asking his client’s betrothed to make certain her Executor will make the “exemption” election after her death.

It is also not too much of a stretch to think that some wealthy bachelors and bachelorettes may seek out singles with unused “exemptions,” short life expectancies, and no assets, as ideal marriage partners.

Look at it from this slightly different perspective. Imagine that your spouse passes away this year with no assets. You (the surviving spouse) expect to receive a large inheritance in the future when your parents pass away. The inheritance from your parents will push the size of your estate well above $5,000,000 (the size of your exemption).

In such a case, the exemption of your deceased spouse would be very important in shielding your estate (augmented by the inheritance you receive from your parents) from estate taxes at your death; and, as the Executor of your spouse’s estate, you should file a federal estate tax return within nine months after your spouse’s death to claim your spouse’s unused exemption even though your spouse’s estate has no value at all.

The current federal estate tax rules, including the rules relating to the portable exemption, are temporary and are scheduled to expire on January 1, 2013. Estate planners expect Congress to act to prevent expiration of the current rules or to enact different rules. In the meantime, while waiting for Congress to give us a permanent set of rules, it makes sense to take steps to preserve the portable “exemption” for the surviving spouse by filing estate tax returns for the estate of the deceased spouse even when the estate has no value.

Posted on 7/9/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member,  Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

     
  Join Email List  
     

For Email Marketing you can trust.

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

Chipman Mazzucco | Promote Your Page Too

It’s Not Too Late (Fixing Your Estate Plan After Your Death)

April 4, 2011

Recent state and federal estate tax changes have created difficult tax traps which can be avoided if your survivors take appropriate steps (commonly referred to as “post mortem planning”) after your death.

Post mortem planning not only includes projections of cash needs and identifying problems relating to the disposition of certain assets, it also includes consideration of a variety of estate and income tax elections, generation skipping tax exemption allocations, disclaimers and the division of certain trusts into subtrusts.

To assure that your survivors have the proper tools and authority to adopt an effective post mortem plan, your estate planning documents (your Will and frequently a revocable trust) should include enabling provisions.

For your survivors to benefit from post mortem planning, they (with the help of your advisors) need to review the assets and the relevant documents shortly after your death before they receive any substantial property as your beneficiary. Failure to satisfy technical requirements before applicable deadlines may be costly.

Consider this example. The federal estate tax exemption is now significantly larger than many state estate tax exemptions. This can create an estate tax trap for married individuals. Your surviving spouse can avoid the trap, if your Will includes provisions that allow your spouse to make certain post-death decisions (tax elections and disclaimers) necessary to avoid the state estate tax. Such decisions often must be made within nine months after your death.

Imagine that your spouse died in 2011 and you are the Executor and a beneficiary of your spouse’s Will. The Will (like so many Wills signed by married individuals for the last several decades) provides that an amount equal to your spouse’s federal estate tax exemption (currently $5,000,000) will pass to a trust (call it the “Exemption Trust”) for your benefit. (Note: For an explanation of trusts, go to our recent post entitled “The Benefits of Trusts.” For a discussion of how the Exemption Trust can be part of a plan to reduce estate taxes, go to one of our older posts entitled “All Estate Plans with Marital Deduction Formula Documents Should be Reviewed.”)

This type of Will made a lot of sense many years ago when it was prepared (when the federal estate tax exemption was lower and the state estate tax exemption was the same as or larger than the federal exemption) but tax rules have changed. When the Will was drafted, perhaps the federal exemption was as low as $675,000. Also, the estate tax exemptions of the states were usually the same as the federal exemption. Now, Connecticut’s exemption is $3,500,000 and will probably be changed to $2,000,000 effective retroactively to January 1, 2011. New York’s exemption is $1,000,000. These state estate tax exemptions are substantially less than the current federal exemption ($5,000,000). Under these circumstances, your spouse’s Will may result in an unnecessary tax.

Assume that immediately before your spouse’s death your assets have a value of $500,000 and that your spouse’s estate has a value of $5,000,000. Without post mortem planning, if your spouse dies in 2011 with you surviving, the result would be as follows:

(1) The Exemption Trust would be $5,000,000, the total estate.

(2) You (the surviving spouse) would receive no portion of the estate because all the estate would go to the Exemption Trust. (Note: If you were to receive an inheritance from your spouse, it would be free of estate tax. Transfers from one spouse to a U.S. citizen spouse are not subject to any estate tax.)

(3) There would be no federal estate tax because the value of the property passing to non-spouse beneficiaries (the Exemption Trust) would not exceed the $5,000,000 federal exemption.

(4) There would be a Connecticut estate tax because the value of the property passing to non-spouse beneficiaries (the Exemption Trust) would exceed the Connecticut estate tax exemption. If the Connecticut exemption is $3,500,000, the Connecticut estate tax would be approximately $122,000. The Connecticut exemption will probably be changed, however, to $2,000,000 retroactive to January 1, 2011. In that case, the Connecticut estate tax would be approximately $238,000.

(5) Because your entire spouse’s estate would pass to the Exemption Trust, your estate would remain at $500,000 (the assets you owned immediately before your spouse’s death). At your subsequent death, your estate would be far less than any of the exemptions that might apply ($2,000,000 or $3,500,000 for Connecticut and $5,000,000 for the federal estate tax (scheduled to return to $1,000,000 in 2013). Accordingly, there would be no federal or state estate taxes at the time of your death in the future.

In hindsight, assuming that the federal exemption will not return to $1,000,000, it would have been better to limit the amount passing to the Exemption Trust to the value of the Connecticut exemption ($3,500,000). This would have eliminated the Connecticut estate tax. It would also mean that you (as surviving spouse) would receive $1,500,000 more from your spouse’s estate. As a result, your estate would be $2,000,000. If that is the value of your estate at your death, it would be less than the estate tax exemptions. Accordingly, there would be no estate tax (federal or Connecticut) at your death. All $5,500,000 which you and your spouse owned together would pass to your children without estate tax. The Connecticut estate tax would have been eliminated without any hardship or risk.

Your spouse’s Will cannot be changed after her death but, if her Will includes provisions which will allow your spouse’s survivors (you, the Executor and the Trustee) to make certain elections, allocations and other decisions, you may still achieve the desired tax goal.

For example, the Exemption Trust might be drafted to allow your spouse’s Executor to make an election (referred to as a “QTIP election”) to treat a portion of the Exemption Trust as a Marital Trust (which would be treated for tax purposes as if it passes to you as surviving spouse instead of to the Exemption Trust). As a result, the Exemption Trust portion would be reduced to $3,500,000 and the Connecticut estate tax would be avoided. The terms of the Will could then allow the Executor and the Trustee to split the Exemption Trust into two separate trusts (the Marital Trust and the Exemption Trust) which would be managed separately.

A different approach would involve disclaimers. A disclaimer is a rejection of (or refusal to accept) an inheritance. Your spouse’s Will might be drafted so that, if you disclaim your interests in a portion of the Exemption Trust, the disclaimed portion will pass to a Marital Trust thereby reducing the Exemption Trust. As a result, the Connecticut estate tax could be eliminated.

Post mortem planning can be challenging. In an environment where the tax rules frequently change, the course to take is not always clear. In the example above, we assumed that the federal exemption will not return to $1,000,000. If it were to return to $1,000,000, however, your decision might be different. You might decide that, to reduce your future federal estate tax (at rates starting at more than 40%), the QTIP election, or the disclaimer, should be made only to the extent doing so would not cause your estate, in the future at your death, to be larger than the federal estate tax exemption. Although taking such an approach now (at the time of your spouse’s death) would create a Connecticut estate tax, you might consider it a reasonable price to pay to avoid a future high federal estate tax. Using the facts from the example above, payment of a Connecticut estate tax ($122,000 to $238,000) from your spouse’s estate this year could achieve significant savings at the time of your death (from approximately $435,000 to $1,220,000 depending on the situation).

Theoretically, the savings to be achieved from maximizing the portion of your spouse’s estate that passes to the Exemption Trust without generating a federal estate tax (but at the cost of generating a Connecticut estate tax of from $122,000 to $238,000) can be from approximately $825,000 to approximately $1,650,000.

Your final decision regarding the post mortem planning options described above could also depend on other factors such as your age and health, plans to move to a different state, prospects that your estate will grow after your spouse’s death, prospects that the value of your estate will decrease after your spouse’s death, and the types of assets involved. For example, retirement accounts such as IRAs, 401(k) plans, and 403B plans which have not yet been subjected to income tax present additional challenges.

The number of tax elections and planning opportunities that might arise is equal to the number of diverse fact patterns our clients leave behind for their survivors to manage. The example above is one sample. The following is a list (not intended to be complete) of post mortem planning opportunities that come to mind as I write this post. In my experience, post mortem planning has most frequently related to:

(1) IRAs and other types of retirement accounts;

(2) Income taxation of estates and trusts, including elections relating to deductions for certain debts and expenses and use of a fiscal year instead of a calendar year;

(3) Elections to treat a revocable living trust as an estate for income tax purposes;

(4) Alternate valuation and valuation of special use assets;

(5) Deferral of estate tax payments;

(6) Charitable deductions for estate and income tax purposes;

(7) Elections to qualify certain trusts for the estate tax marital deduction;

(9) Allocation of the generation skipping tax exemption, and the division of trusts into subtrusts, to accomplish generation skipping tax goals;

(10) Tax effects of post death distributions from a business entity to a business owner’s estate, including corporate redemptions;

(11) Effects of a shareholder’s death on S corporation status and elections available to allow continued qualification;

(12) Disclaimers; and

(13) Court reformations of documents that do not satisfy technical requirements relating to marital and charitable deductions.

The above is a fairly long list but I have no doubt that the list of omissions would be quite a bit longer. The fact patterns we face will often suggest new opportunities for creative planning.

Posted on 4/4/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member,  Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

 

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 

 

For Email Marketing you can trust

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

The Benefits of Trusts

February 10, 2011

Trusts offer many advantages including asset management, protection from creditors and protection from taxes at more than one generation level. They can be drafted in a variety of ways. Trusts can be used as a gifting tool, established during life, or included in a Will, to be established after death. What type of trust a client will use will depend on the situation including the ages, abilities and resources of the beneficiaries of the trust.

For example, if you are married and considering making a large gift while the gift tax exemption is $5,000,000, the gift could be to a trust which includes your spouse (as well as children, grandchildren and even younger generations) as a beneficiary. This type of trust is frequently called a “Spousal Access Trust.” Your spouse could be a Trustee of the trust (ideally with one or more other Trustees) and your spouse could receive benefits from the trust. As a result, the income need not be totally lost to your household (at least as long as your spouse is living).

The terms of your Spousal Access Trust could grant your spouse significant powers to determine how the trust assets and income would be used to provide benefits for other beneficiaries, including the power to dispose of the trust assets according to the terms of your spouse’s Will (so long as the power is properly limited). If properly drafted, the trust would be sheltered from estate, gift and generation skipping tax at the time of your spouse’s death and at the deaths of your children and their children.

Trusts can also be included in your Will as an important tax-saving device. For a discussion about the potential tax-saving features of trusts, go here: January 10, 2010 post.

In addition, a trust may be the best way to provide a benefit for someone who is not up to managing assets. For example, trusts can be used to protect trust assets from a beneficiary’s creditors and to exclude trust assets from consideration if the beneficiary needs to apply for government assistance (like Medicaid to help cover the costs of long-term care). For more information about this type of trust, go here: Special Needs Trusts.

Trust Basics – What You Should Know

(1) Trust assets are managed by a Trustee (a person or bank) for the benefit of others. The beneficiaries, therefore, do not have control over the trust assets. A Trustee, however, must account to the beneficiaries for its actions. It is generally preferable to give a Trustee broad discretion (limited, however, by prudence) regarding investment decisions. Often, depending on circumstances, a Trustee may also be given broad discretion to decide how benefits will be divided among members of a class of beneficiaries.

(2) Depending on the client’s goals, the trust can be drafted to severely limit beneficiary influence and access or to generously maximize the beneficiary’s influence and access.

(3) The most important decision regarding the use of a trust is the identity of the Trustee. The Trustee must, among other things, be meticulous about keeping separate and complete records, prudent with respect to investments, sensitive to the needs of the beneficiaries and fair in its dealings with both the trust and all beneficiaries.

(4) The management of trusts involves some expense relating to the Trustee’s compensation, court costs and legal fees.

(5) A trust can be drafted containing an endless variety of provisions to accomplish many different goals.

Posted on 2/10/2011 by Kasey S. Galner, Associate, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 


For Email Marketing you can trust

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.



Two Year Tax Planning Window of Opportunity for Large Gifts

February 9, 2011

Estate and Gift Tax Opportunity

As a result of legislation enacted by Congress in December, the current (but temporary) estate and gift tax exemption is increased to $5,000,000. The $5,000,000 exemption applies to the estates of those who die in, and to gifts made in, 2011 and 2012.

In addition, the highest estate and gift tax bracket applicable in 2011 and 2012 has been reduced to 35%.

In 2013, however, the old $1,000,000 estate and gift tax exemption is scheduled to return along with 55% as the highest estate and gift tax rate.

In light of such compelling tax facts, high net worth clients may be highly motivated to make large gifts before 2013.  If clients delay making such gifts until after 2012, and if Congress does not act to change the current law, the estate and gift tax exemption will revert to $1,000,000. The opportunity to transfer an additional $4,000,000 free of estate and gift tax will be lost.

The estate tax that may be saved as a result of making large gifts in 2011 and 2012 can be significant. For example, assume that an unmarried client has an estate with a value of $10,000,000. If he makes no gift and if he dies in 2013 when the $1,000,000 exemption and higher tax rates apply, the U.S. estate tax would be approximately $3,727,000 and the state estate tax (we are using New York tax law for this article)  would be approximately $1,068,000 for a total estate tax obligation of approximately $4,795,000.

If the client believes he needs no more than $5,000,000 for himself, however, he might be inclined to make a gift of the rest ($5,000,000) to his children (or in trust for them). If the client were to make a gift of $5,000,000 in 2012 and die in 2013, there would be no U.S. gift tax to pay and the total estate tax would be $2,750,000 (federal, $2,359,000, and state, $391,600). The estate tax saved would be more than $2,000,000.

You can find details regarding how the gift and estate tax is calculated here: No Tax Clawback Pursuant to Section 304 of TRUIRJCA.

In Connecticut, the gift of $5,000,000 in 2012 would result in a gift tax of approximately $122,000. Although the $122,000 gift tax obligation would represent an upfront cost, the overall tax benefits would still be substantial and would not be materially different. Keep in mind that in Connecticut a gift tax is incurred only when cumulative taxable gifts exceed $3,500,000.

Generation Skipping Tax Opportunity

The generation skipping tax exemption has also been temporarily increased to $5,000,000. This means that, if your gift of $5,000,000 is to a generation skipping trust, you can allocate your $5,000,000 generation skipping tax exemption to the trust and, as a result, shelter the trust assets (including all appreciation) from estate, gift and generation skipping tax for many generations.

Other Advantages

Keep in mind that the opportunity to make larger gifts of income producing property free of gift, estate and generation skipping taxes includes the opportunity to shift income, which is generated by the assets you give away, to lower-income tax bracket taxpayers.

It is also an opportunity to protect assets from the claims of creditors, whether your own future creditors or the creditors of your beneficiaries.

If you are married, the gift could be to a trust which includes your spouse (as well as children, grandchildren and even younger generations) as a beneficiary. As a result, the income need not be totally lost to your household (at least as long as your spouse is living).

You can find more information about what a trust is, and common terms included in a trust, here: The Benefits of Trusts.

What Is the Down Side?

The motivation to make large gifts now is partially the result of an expectation that the old estate tax rules may return in 2013 with a $1,000,000 exemption and a 55% estate tax rate. What if Congress makes the current, more generous rules permanent so that, if death occurs in 2013 or later, the $5,000,000 exemption will apply?

Assuming no significant appreciation in the value of the assets after the time the gift was made, there would be no estate tax cost or benefit associated with making the gift now instead of waiting to do so at the time of your death through the terms of your Will.

By making the gift now, however, your cost basis (for capital gain tax purposes) would be carried over to the donee of the gift. If the donee of the gift sells the donated asset, a capital gain tax could result based on the difference between the sale price and the carryover basis.

On the other hand, if you were to retain the assets until your death, the cost basis would be adjusted to the date of death value. As a result, the capital gain tax upon the subsequent sale of the assets by the beneficiaries who inherited the assets might be significantly reduced.

Accordingly, even though there would be little difference in the estate tax result, if a large gift is made, the opportunity to obtain a beneficial adjusted cost basis could be lost. Keep in mind, however, that careful tax planning can defer and minimize the capital gain tax to some extent. As a result, the capital gain tax risk is speculative and difficult to value.

The discussion above assumes that there is no increase in value after the gift is made. Keep in mind that, if the assets, which were the subject of the gift, increase in value, the increase would escape estate and gift taxation.

Fear of the “Tax Clawback”

Estate planners have expressed concern that, if death occurs in 2013 after a large gift has been made in 2011 or 2012, and after the U.S. estate tax exemption of $1,000,000 is reinstated, the estate tax would be calculated in a manner that, in effect, subjects the large gift made in 2011 or 2012 to an additional tax.  Commentators have referred to this as a “tax clawback.”  

The consensus among tax experts, who have looked at the issue closely, however, seems to be that the calculation which results in the tax clawback is incorrect.

Tax professionals who are reading this blog may want more details regarding the tax clawback issue. For details, go here:  No Tax Clawback Pursuant to Section 304 of TRUIRJCA.

What if there is a tax clawback? In the example above, if the Will includes a common type of tax clause, the estate, which consists of only $5,000,000 (what remains in the client’s estate after the gift is made), would bear a total estate tax burden of more than $4,135,000. If the beneficiaries under the Will are different from the donees of the gift, the beneficiaries under the Will would no doubt be extremely disappointed and would likely be looking for someone to blame for such an “unfair” result.

It is not difficult to imagine a situation where the estate tax due would actually exceed the value of the probate assets that would commonly bear the burden of the tax.

To recognize the issue is to reinforce how important it is to carefully allocate tax burdens among beneficiaries. Although we are confident that a proper interpretation of the most recent tax legislation removes the prospect of the tax clawback, until the IRS acknowledges that view, we cannot be certain that the IRS will agree.  As always, it is best to take great care in allocating tax burdens by properly crafting tax clauses in your Wills and other estate planning documents. 

Posted on 2/9/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member, and Kasey Galner, Associate, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

 

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 


For Email Marketing you can trust

 

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.

No Tax Clawback Pursuant to Section 304 of TRUIRJCA

February 9, 2011

In our post entitled Two Year Planning Window of Opportunity for Large Gifts we invited you to come here for the legal reasoning behind the conclusion that there will be no tax clawback with respect to the estates of clients who die after 2012 and who make large gifts in 2011 or 2012.

We can take no credit for the brain work involved in reaching this conclusion. Rather, we must give credit to Dan Evans who published a newsletter on the topic via the fabulous resources of Leimberg Information Services (http://www.leimbergservices.com/blogwatch.cfm#). That conclusion has been confirmed via Paul Caron, editor of the TaxProf Blog, reporting on the opinions of tax experts participating in a BNA Tax & Accounting Webinar scheduled for February 10, 2011.

Nevertheless, we closely examined the rationale presented by Mr. Evans before being able to agree with his conclusions and the conclusions of other experts.

This is the rationale.

Section 304 of the legislation enacted in December by Congress (bearing the name of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRUIRJCA)) says:

Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall apply to amendments made by this section [sic: title].

Section 901 (Sunset of Provisions of Act) of EGTTRA says:

(a) IN GENERAL.—All provisions of, and amendments made by, this Act shall not apply—

(1) …

(2) In the case of title V, to estates of decedents dying, gifts made, or generation skipping transfers, after December 31, 2010.

(b) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LAWS.—The Internal Revenue Code of 1986…shall be applied and administered to years, estates, gifts, and transfers described in subsection (a) as if the provisions and amendments described in subsection (a) had never been enacted.

Accordingly, after 2012 the provisions of EGTRRA do not apply and the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code must be applied as if EGTRRA were never enacted. We will refer to the law as if EGTRRA were never enacted as Pre-EGGTRA law.

Although we will describe the calculation in more detail below, keep in mind that the U.S. estate tax is computed by adding the value of the estate to the value of taxable gifts to arrive at a Tentative Tax Base. The Tentative Estate Tax is determined based on the Tentative Tax Base. To determine the U.S. estate tax, the Tentative Estate Tax is then reduced: (1) by the gift tax obligation related to the gifts that were made; (2) the unified credit against the estate tax (this is the credit that results in what we refer to as the estate tax exemption); and (3) a credit for state estate taxes paid (other credits also may be available for special situations).

At issue when discussing the possibility of an estate tax clawback is how to compute the reduction for the gift tax obligation referred to above in red.

The gift tax obligation is a function of the unified credit and the gift tax rates. The unified credit after 2012, according to Pre-EGTRRA law, is $345,800 (resulting in what is often referred to as a $1,000,000 estate and gift tax exemption). As mentioned above, the unified credit is applied against a Tentative Estate Tax (and gift tax) to arrive at the actual tax due. Under pre-EGGTRA law, the tentative gift tax on a $5,000,000 taxable gift would be $2,390,800. To arrive at the tax due, the unified credit of $345,800 (the credit which would apply if EGTRRA had not been enacted) would be applied against the tentative gift tax to arrive at the gift tax of $2,045,000. This is the tax that would have been due if the rules were applied as if EGTRRA were never enacted. Of course, if the gift is made in 2011 or 2012 there would be no actual gift tax to pay because the exemption in those years is actually $5,000,000.

In computing the estate tax on the estate of the client who dies in 2013 after making a gift of $5,000,000 in 2012, the tentative estate tax is computed on the sum of the taxable estate and the taxable gifts. In this case such sum would be $10,000,000 which is referred to as the tentative tax base.

The tentative tax on a tentative tax base of $10,000,000 is $5,140,000.

Section 2001(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code says that in determining the estate tax the tentative tax is reduced by “the aggregate amount of tax which would have been payable under chapter 12 [the gift tax chapter] with respect to gifts made by the decedent after December 31, 1976, if the modifications described in subsection (g) had been applicable at the time of such gifts.”

The modifications described in subsection (g) are modifications enacted as part of TRUIRJCA and would have been applicable at the time of the 2012 gift. Accordingly, for purposes of computing the reduction under 2001(b)(2), the reduction is the gift tax that would have been payable, not the gift tax actually paid.

The estate tax is being calculated in 2013 (the assumed year of the client’s death) after the provisions of TRUIRJCA have sunsetted. Because Section 304 of TRUIRJCA says that the sunset rules of Section 901 of EGTRRA apply, the pre-EGTRRA law applies to both the estate and gift tax calculations.

The final calculation therefore looks like this:

(1) The Taxable Estate of $5,000,000 and the Taxable Gift of $5,000,000 would be added together to arrive at the Tentative Tax Base of $10,000,000.

(2) The U. S. Tentative Estate Tax on a Tentative Tax Base of $10,000,000 would be $5,140,800.

(3) To arrive at the U. S. estate tax, the Tentative Estate Tax is reduced by the U.S. gift tax that would have been incurred according the law as it would be if EGTRRA were never enacted in 2001. The gift tax that would have been incurred is $2,045,000.

(4) In addition, the Tentative Estate tax is reduced by the Unified Credit available according to the law that would be if EGTRRA were never enacted. Such a Unified Credit is $345,800. The Unified Credit shelters assets having a value of $1,000,000 from U.S. estate and gift taxes according to the law that would have existed if EGTRRA were never enacted.

(5) The Tentative Estate Tax is reduced further by the Credit for N.Y. estate tax which would be $391,600.

(6) The result of the calculations described above is a U.S. Estate Tax equal to $2,358,400.

As Dan Evans points out, the result is what you would expect if gift tax policies of the past were consistently applied to the current gift tax. He explains that past policy dictated that lifetime gifts were made a part of the estate tax calculation only for the purpose of determining the estate tax brackets to be applied to the estate that remains after lifetime gifts were made. The calculation methodology was never intended to be used as a way to subject lifetime gifts to additional tax.

In the example above, if the policy is properly applied, you would expect that the estate tax on the taxable estate of $5,000,000 would be 55% or $2,750,000. This is exactly the result achieved above when the U.S. estate tax and the New York estate tax are added for a total of $2,750,000.

Posted on 2/9/2011 by Richard S. Land, Member, Chipman, Mazzucco, Land & Pennarola, LLC.

We frequently post articles relating to estate planning, estate settlement and elder law issues to this blog. We also post notices about our client seminars here. When we do, we send out notices to clients and friends of the firm. If you would like to get our notices, please join our mailing list by clicking below.

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 


For Email Marketing you can trust

Notice: To comply with U.S. Treasury Department rules and regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction, tax strategy or other activity.